Emergency rule in Pakistan: Your views

Send us your thoughts on President Pervez Musharraf's decision to impose emergency rule in Pakistan. Read more


Seeing the light of day

Oh, the light! The autumn light! Is there anything more glorious than an October day, awash in the sun's low-slung amber rays? And yet ... perhaps you feel the dread, too. Read more


In the first place, simple pleasures were fun and free

Sunday, November 04, 2007 November marks the first anniversary of Tales of the City. During the past year, we've received personal essays on every sort of topic: geek love, accidental encounters, the saving grace of music and dealing with cancer and Alzheimer's disease. Read more


PARKER: Waffling, not being a woman, makes Hillary a target

Saturday, November 03, 2007 When you're leading the Democratic presidential race, as Hillary Clinton is, you might expect other candidates to focus their sharpest criticism your way. Yet the spin coming out of the Clinton campaign is that the men were ganging up on Hillary. Read more


Black: Have it all,or have what makes you happy

Saturday, November 03, 2007 NEW YORK — There's a phrase that came into vogue awhile back: "having it all. Read more


All news [archive] RSS




Read more news here:



Thompson: "Wrong Answer"

Thompson: "Wrong Answer"

Fred Thompson has some thoughts on Hillary: I've mentioned it before, but Fred does very well in this kind of informal chat video, which is not really an ad. But what if this is what Fred's ads will look like?...



NASA's hidden anxiety

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which has a mandate to enhance the safety of air travel, has been suppressing huge quantities of data that apparently show the risks for civilian aircraft are much higher than commonly estimated.

The agency's lame excuses for refusing to release the information must make any traveler wonder how bad the implications might be.

Several years ago, NASA began interviewing airline and general aviation pilots about how often they saw risky incidents, like near collisions, or stressful last-second changes in landing instructions. Some 24,000 interviews were conducted over a four-year period before the program, and plans to interview air traffic controllers, flight attendants and mechanics, were scrapped.

When The Associated Press sought the data under the Freedom of Information Act, the request was rejected by a high NASA official. He said releasing the data "could materially affect the public confidence in, and the commercial welfare of, the air carriers and general aviation companies whose pilots participated in the survey." NASA's mandate is not to protect the commercial welfare of the airline industry, it is to enhance the safety of all who fly. It also apparently never occurred to NASA that suppressing this data could damage public confidence even more than releasing it.

One person familiar with the results told The AP that pilots reported at least twice as many bird strikes, midair near-collisions and runway incursions as other government monitoring systems show. Another person involved in the survey told us that the rates were higher than government regulators had been recording.

NASA now says the study was designed to develop a survey methodology, not to assess air carrier safety. It plans to complete a report on the methodology by year's end. That is not enough. In responding to the furor, NASA's administrator, Michael Griffin said, "NASA should focus on how we can provide information to the public - not on how we can withhold it."

We agree. Griffin should ensure that his agency analyzes its survey and then releases that analysis and all the interview data so that other experts can analyze it as well.

Original text is here



  Add comment

Name: 
E-Mail: 
Comment: 
Enter code: 


Main page | Rss feeds | News archive | All news | |